Refutation of Cessationism – Part 1

(I am going to post a series on the unbiblical doctrine of cessationism for few weeks with refutation of each arguments for cessationism each week)

Introduction:

Cessationism is a doctrinal stand which says that the miracles, prophecies, tongues, supernatural healings by the Holy Spirit etc., (Charismatic gifts) has stopped after the closure of Canon of Scripture. It is important that we define our terms correctly before starting an argument. So I am going to use the definition of CARM on Cessationism:

“Cessationism is the position within Christianity that the Charismatic Spiritual gifts (speaking in tongues, word of knowledge, word of wisdom, interpretation of tongues, etc.) ceased with the closing of the Canon of scripture and/or the death of the last apostle.”

Many Christians consider Cessationism as a minor doctrinal position like Baptism etc, which means that a person may choose to not to be a cessationist but still his salvation won’t be affected by his stance. Whereas few other Christians are so vocal and some even consider that a person may be damned to hell if he is not believing in Cessationism. Take for example the case of Dr. John MacArthur from his statement in his conference ‘Strange Fire’:

“Why don’t evangelical leaders speak against this (Charismatic) movement?  Why is their such silence? Look When somebody attacks the person of Christ the Evangelical world rises up and says “no, no, no!”  . . . the Holy Spirit has been under massive assault for decades and decades, and Ive been asking the question ‘where are the people rising up in protest against the abuse and the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit?‘ The only thing I can suggest is that they have been literally backed up into a corner by intimidation that they need to be loving and accepting and tolerant and not divisive in the body of Christ, thats been the mantra. . .”

According to Dr. John MacArthur, if a person is doing miracles or speaking in tongues in this era, he is damned to hell because he is blaspheming the Holy Spirit, even if he claims to be a Christian and shows signs of regeneration. This is just to show you the seriousness of this issue. Many Cessationist are like him vocally accusing Christians of following a damnable heresy.

Even with this background, I can say that I am a continuationist. I believe that Charismatic Spiritual gifts has not yet ceased. The reason I am doing so is because I have Scripture as my support to prove that Charismatic Spiritual gifts to exist even now. Not only that, I am going to show that all cessationists are basing their theology on slippery slope with no scriptural evidence for their stance. I know I may be branded by these militant Cessationist as a ‘heretic’ for being a Continuationist, but Catholics did the same to the reformers for showing Justification by Faith Alone from Scripture. So I fear God more than the approval of men.

In these series of articles, I am going to disprove Cessationism with one argument at a time for each article. So let me start with the first argument today. For this passage, I would like to ask my readers to keep your bible open with 1Corinthian 13 all the time so that it would be easy for you to follow my arguments as I would be going back and forth the context of those verses to understand and refute cessationism.

Cessationist Argument 1: Charismatic Spiritual gifts will cease when the perfect ( Closed canon) comes (1Cor 13:10):

For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.

(1Co13:9-10)

I think an exposition of this text is sufficient for rebuttal of this argument. Let us look at the background of this text. Apostle Paul has written 1 Corinthians to Corinth church which had been struggling with many sinful practices and wrong ecclesiology. In 1Cor 12-14, he gives regulations on how to use the spiritual gifts. As he was encouraging the church to seek for spiritual gifts, he said, love is much more superior to all other spiritual gifts (1Cor 12:31), because love is patient, kind, bears all things, rejoices in the truth. It is superior to spiritual gifts because, love never ends (1Cor 13:8), but prophecies, tongues and knowledge will cease (1Cor 13:8). Paul goes on to say that “when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away (1Cor 13:10)” So both cessationists and continuationists all agree that prophecies and tongues would cease at some point of time when the ‘perfect’ comes. But both differ at this question, when prophecies and tongues cease to exist. Cessationists say that spiritual gifts would cease with the closure of canon, since according to them, in 1Cor 13:10, perfect means ‘closed canon’. Benjamin Warfield held on to this view. Continuationists would say that spiritual gifts would cease when Christ comes back again, when we are all glorified, since ‘perfect’ means ‘glorified body’.

So does ‘perfect’ means ‘Closed canon’ or ‘Glorified Body’?

The greek word for perfect in Verse 10 is ‘Teleios’ which means ‘Complete’. I agree that this can be used for both ‘Glorified body’ and ‘Closed Canon’, I would say the context of this verse seems to suggest that it means ‘glorified body’:

1)     The object of this passage is Corinth church. As I have told you before, Paul is addressing the believers in Corinth Church and instructing them the right doctrines. It is against hermeneutics to suddenly change the object from ‘glorified believers’ to ‘Closure of canon’.

2)      In Verse 8, Paul says ‘knowledge will pass away’. Paul here means our ‘knowledge which we know in part’ passes away (Verse 9). Partial Knowledge cannot pass away until the Second coming of Christ because when Christ comes, we will be knowing clearly about Him because Bible promises about that in Hab 2:14: For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the LORD as the waters cover the sea. With the context of Verse 11,12 it would mean only when we see Christ face to face, our partial knowledge will pass away.

3)      Scripture should interpret Scripture. There are similar passages in the Bible which can be used to compare this account. I will quote some here. You can look up the other passages from this website.

“(Matthew 12:32) Whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, neither in this age, nor in that which is to come.

(Mark 10:30) but he will receive one hundred times more now in this time, houses, brothers, sisters, mothers, children, and land, with persecutions; and in the age to come eternal life.

(Luke 18:30) who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the world to come, eternal life

(Ephesians 1:21) far above all rule, and authority, and power, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age, but also in that which is to come.”

From these verses, we can see there are two ages. This age and age to come. What is ‘This age’? This earthly life. What is ‘this age to come’? Glorified New heavens and new earth. 

With this in context read these verse now:

For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. (1Co 13:12)

If we apply the rule ‘Scripture interpret Scripture’, then the best possible meaning for the word ‘face to face’ is ‘Christ in New Heavens after second coming of Christ’, not ‘Closed Canon’. If you disagree here, then you would have to reject 2^nd coming of Christ and be a strict preterist.

This is why John Calvin also comments ‘Perfect’ as ‘Glorified body’ and ‘Face to face’ as ‘seeing Christ when we are glorified after His 2^nd coming’.

“He now proves that prophecy, and other gifts of that nature, are done away, [798] because they are conferred upon us to help our infirmity. Now our imperfection will one day have an end. Hence the use, even of those gifts, will, at the same time, be discontinued, for it were absurd that they should remain and be of no use. They will, therefore, perish. This subject he pursues to the end of the chapter.

9. We know in part This passage is misinterpreted by most persons, as if it meant that our knowledge, and in like manner our prophecy, is not yet perfect, but that we are daily making progress in them. Paul's meaning, however, is -- that it is owing to our imperfection that we at present have knowledge and prophecy. Hence the phrase in part means -- "Because we are not yet perfect." Knowledge and prophecy, therefore, have place among us so long as that imperfection cleaves to us, to which they are helps. It is true, indeed, that we ought to make progress during our whole life, and that everything that we have is merely begun. Let us observe, however, what Paul designs to prove -- that the gifts in question are but temporary. Now he proves this from the circumstance, that the advantage of them is only for a time -- so long as we aim at the mark by making progress every day.

10. When that which is perfect is come "When the goal has been reached, then the helps in the race will be done away." He retains, however, the form of expression that he had already made use of, when he contrasts perfection with what is in part "Perfection," says he, "when it will arrive, will put an end to everything that aids imperfection." But when will that perfection come? It begins, indeed, at death, for then we put off, along with the body, many infirmities; but it will not be completely manifested until the day of judgment, as we shall hear presently. Hence we infer, that the whole of this discussion is ignorantly applied to the time that is intermediate.”

And on the phrace ‘Face to face’, Calvin comments like this:

The ministry of the word, I say, is like a looking-glass For the angels have no need of preaching, or other inferior helps, nor of sacraments, for they enjoy a vision of God of another kind; [802] and God does not give them a view of his face merely in a mirror, but openly manifests himself as present with them. We, who have not as yet reached that great height, behold the image of God as it is presented before us in the word, in the sacraments, and, in fine, in the whole of the service of the Church. This vision Paul here speaks of as partaking of obscurity -- not as though it were doubtful or delusive, but because it is not so distinct as that which will be at last afforded on the final day.

We can clearly see that Calvin also is also interpreting this passage like a continuationist. Christ is what we see face to face when we are perfect.

Also there are two problems if we mean ‘closure of canon’ as ‘perfect’:

1)      It means that the Scriptures were not perfect till the closure of Canon. Just because new testament was not completed during that time, that doesn’t make Old testament Scriptures as ‘imperfect’. For example in James 1:25, he says the law is perfect and he is using the same greek word ‘teleos’. So this view actually undermines the nature of Scripture and opens up the possibility of ‘imperfect Scripture somehow became perfect after canon was closed’ which is fallacious.

2)      If Cessationism is true, then ‘knowledge should have also passed away now if tongues get ceased to exist at the closure of canon’ (1Co 13:8: Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away ). If that is the case, then no one can be believing in Christ! How can anyone believe in Christ without God revealing His knowledge about Christ? Cessationism actually opens up a Pandora box of logical fallacies!

This is the end of my rebuttal of first argument of cessationism. I will refute the other arguments of cessationism in the following articles and I would request my readers to keep following. Soli Deo Gloria!

God - The Portion for Righteous Man

(I gave this sermon on 17-2-2015 in Danish Mission Hospital, Thirukoilur)

A Psalm of Asaph. Truly God is good to Israel, to those who are pure in heart. But as for me, my feet had almost stumbled, my steps had nearly slipped. For I was envious of the arrogant when I saw the prosperity of the wicked. For they have no pangs until death; their bodies are fat and sleek. They are not in trouble as others are; they are not stricken like the rest of mankind. Therefore pride is their necklace; violence covers them as a garment. Their eyes swell out through fatness; their hearts overflow with follies. They scoff and speak with malice; loftily they threaten oppression. They set their mouths against the heavens, and their tongue struts through the earth. Therefore his people turn back to them, and find no fault in them. And they say, "How can God know? Is there knowledge in the Most High?" Behold, these are the wicked; always at ease, they increase in riches. All in vain have I kept my heart clean and washed my hands in innocence. For all the day long I have been stricken and rebuked every morning. If I had said, "I will speak thus," I would have betrayed the generation of your children. But when I thought how to understand this, it seemed to me a wearisome task, until I went into the sanctuary of God; then I discerned their end. Truly you set them in slippery places; you make them fall to ruin. How they are destroyed in a moment, swept away utterly by terrors! Like a dream when one awakes, O Lord, when you rouse yourself, you despise them as phantoms. When my soul was embittered, when I was pricked in heart, I was brutish and ignorant; I was like a beast toward you. Nevertheless, I am continually with you; you hold my right hand. You guide me with your counsel, and afterward you will receive me to glory. Whom have I in heaven but you? And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you. My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever. For behold, those who are far from you shall perish; you put an end to everyone who is unfaithful to you. But for me it is good to be near God; I have made the Lord GOD my refuge, that I may tell of all your works.

(Psa 73:1-28)

I will divide my sermon into three topics, Exposition of Psalms, Doctrine and Practical Application.

Exposition:

The psalmist is a righteous man who has written this psalm from his perspective. He sees the lives of two types of people, an upright man and an unrighteous sinner. The unrighteous man is always proud (v.6) with all types of riches and wealth (v.12). Inspite of all these blessings he never thanks God or honour Him rather, he mocks at God (v.11). Even then he still never has any sufferings in this world (v.4,7).

But the psalmist is an upright and holy man of God (v.13), yet he is struggling with many sufferings (v.14). So he is actually envious of the unbeliever (v.3)

When he sees this from the Sanctuary of God (v.17), he understood the end of the evil men. God has kept them in a slippery slope (v.18-20) and they will be destroyed by God. Then the righteous psalmist realised his folly of envying the unbeliever and he was praising God for being his portion and strength for him (v.23,26)

Doctrine:

a)      God is sovereign over both believers and unbelievers:

God controls everything He has created. He upholds the universe by His word (Heb 1:3). So God is in control of the life of both believers and unbelievers.

b)      God is in control of both riches and poverty for His glory:

I am going to show you three examples how God can use both riches for destruction of a person and poverty for blessing a person.

First is the example of rich man and poor Lazarus. Rich man had all the wealth and comfort with all the pomp in this world. But his end was a miserable one since he was not upright. Whereas poor Lazarus, though he was poor in this world, yet he was a righteous man thus when he died, he entered heaven and was with God. Another instance is the story of Haman in Esther. God used Haman’s wealth for his own destruction (Est 9:12). Here we see that the earthly comfort which the evil men have is not good before God but rather they are for bringing destruction to evil people.

God can use poverty as a means of blessing for an elect. Job lost all his wealth and his health yet God used that for testing the faith of Job. Bible says in Rom 5:3-5: More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us. (Rom 5:3-5). In other words, trials for a Christian is good and it will make him even more holy and upright before the Lord and ultimately will glorify God.

Conclusion:

Riches and Poverty doesn’t determine blessedness. Only righteousness is considered as blessed by God:

If you are in Christ, if you are a child of God, even if you are suffering, that is ultimately for your good. If you are having worldly blessings like good health, wealth and prosperity and you are a believer, then it is your responsibility to use that worldly blessing for God’s glory. Ultimately, in front of God’s eyes, righteous man is the blessed man and only he would inherit the heavenly kingdom. He may be poor and miserable in this earth but he would eventually be satisfied by God in Heaven. So to be blessed, we have to be righteous. Let us seek God’s righteousness and seek to glorify him to the utmost.

Canon of Scripture

(This is my transcript for the sermon I had given on 15-2-2015 in Vellore Reformed Church, Christian Medical College, Vellore)

There are many ‘Christians’ who read Scriptures, who discuss about many doctrines, who wants to know about the intricacies of Baptism and second coming of Christ but when it comes to their practical life, there is no spiritual fruits. They live just like non Christians, they think just like non Christians and their actions also would be like non Christians. Jesus says, “Whoever does not love me does not keep my words (Joh 14:24)”. So if you are indeed loving God, your actions will be Biblical and God honouring. And remember, the word of God is so valuable that many Christians have willingly given their lives both in the past and in present just for the sake of reading it.

I hope and pray that the message which I am giving here is not just going to be an academic interest but rather would be life changing and transforming so that we would be glorifying God to the maximum through our obedience to his words.

In this session, I am going to talk on following subtitles:

1)      Pretest: To test our current knowledge before attending this session if we can answer the questions which are normally asked to a Christian from other faith.

2)      Definition of Canon

3)      Principles of Canon

4)      How 66 books of Bible were compiled in the past

5)      What is not canon?

6)      Practical applications of Canon

Pretest:

I am going to give you three practical scenarios. And think about those and if you know the answer, I hope, God willing you would be even more clear about how to answer such questions. If you don’t know the answers, don’t worry you would be able to answer these after this session if you pay attention to what I am telling.

Scenarios:

1)      What about the gospel of Thomas found in 1940s? Would you add that to the gospels in current Bible? If not, Why?

2)      Why the catholic books like Apocrypha not added in Protestant Bible?

3)      Some Hindu sages have said Jesus Christ is mentioned in Rig Veda. So is Rig Veda also God’s Word?

Canon of Scripture – Definition:

According to Merriam Webster, Canon means ‘a criterion or standard of judgement’. It simply means ‘Rule’. Roman Catholics preferred ‘list’ as the definition of Canon. Protestants consider ‘rule’ as the best definition of Canon.

Principles of Canon:

There are three rules which were considered by both old and new testament saints to test the authenticity of Scriptures.

1)     

Internal consistency of 66 books of Bible:

Gordon Clark says, “One of the main test for validity of a worldview is internal consistency of its axiom.” For Christians, we start our worldview with Scripture as the axiom. When I say internal consistency, I mean this: “All 66 books of Bible are not self-contradictory”. From Genesis to Revelation, all 66 books talk about the Attributes of God, the sinfulness of man and the need for a messiah to atone for our sins. This theme has been there throughout the scriptures. Most importantly the greatest test is whether a book is proclaiming Christ or not. Luther said, “This is the touchstone by which all books may be tested, to see whether they proclaim Christ or not, since all Scripture witnesses to Christ, and St.Paul will know nothing save Christ. Whatever does not teach Christ is not apostolic, even were it taught by St. Peter or St. Paul.”

Jesus and New testament authors quoted the passages of Old testament as Scriptures for about 295 times. Even in the new testament era, the apostles quoted from each other’s epistles as ‘Scriptures’. I will get back to you later about this in detail in the next part.

In other words, Bible has been inspired by God through many authors who lived in different parts of time, from different background (Prophets, kings, administrators, doctor, Pharisee, tax collectors) and yet they all proclaim the similar theme which is in unison with rest of the scriptures.

2)     

Illuminating witness of the Holy Spirit:

Before Jesus was taken up to heaven, He said "But when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me. “(Joh 15:26). God has promised us that the Holy Spirit would guide us in truth. Since God’s promises will come to pass, this has been the testimony of Christians throughout all the time. Wayne Grudem puts it in this way:“

“As we read Scripture the Holy Spirit works to convince us that the books we have in Scripture are all from God and are his words to us. It has been the testimony of Christians throughout the ages that as they read the books of the Bible, the words of Scripture speak to their hearts as no other books do. Day after day, year after year, Christians find that the words of the Bible are indeed the words of God speaking to them with an authority, a power, and a persuasiveness that no other writings possess. Truly the Word of God is “living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and spirit, of joints and marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart” (Heb. 4:12).”

3)      God’s providence in closing the canon:

Since God is good and perfect, it is against His nature to hide some of the ‘God’s word’ somewhere in a scroll in a secret place for more than 2000 years after Christ has risen to heaven. Heb 1:1-2 says “Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. “(Heb 1:1-2). This verse is the proof for what I have said with regards to closure of canon. There are two periods of time where God revealed. One during the time of Jewish nation which we call as Old Testament and another during the time of Jesus Christ and the apostles in the 1^st century Rome, which we call it as new testament. And God has Rev 22:18,19 not to add or remove the words from the Word of God. Jesus also says in Mat 5:18, “For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.” These are the assurances from God himself that we don’t need to worry if the Bible is incomplete.

Historical Background on Canon:

The idea of Canon started by God when He gave the Ten Commandments. “And he gave to Moses, when he had made an end of speaking with him upon Mount Sinai, the two tables of the testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God” (Ex. 31:18). Moses wrote from Genesis to Deuteronomy. Joshua and Judges contributed books Joshua and Judges. After that prophets wrote most of the books. King Solomon wrote Proverbs, Song of Solomon and Ecclesiastes. Psalms is collection of many people from different background. Prophets wrote the rest of the books. Last book to be written in Old Testament is Malachi around 435BC. The Jews considered these works as part of Torah and Apocrypha was not considered to be part of Canon. The confusion for Canon of Old testament was not very much because in the New testament Jesus and apostles quoted from these 39 books upto around 295 times.

Just like how the apostles quoted the Old Testament texts, they also quoted New Testament verses as Scriptures. For example, Peter is equating Pauls epistles with Scriptures in 2Pet 3:16 : “So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures” (2 Peter 3:15–16). Paul also quotes from Luke 10:7 for the verse in 1Tim 5:18: For the Scripture says, "You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain," and, "The laborer deserves his wages." (1Ti 5:18). These two instances prove that the new testament books were recognised as Scriptures by the apostles.

Historically, it has been considered that the apostles were entrusted with the writing of books under divine authorship and inspiration of God. Bible says, “For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2Pe 1:21)” So the first century Christians considered new testament books as scriptures and were quoting them in their letters written to churches. But still all 25 books were not compiled together as new testament till 2^nd century. In 2^nd century, a gnostic heresy called ‘Marcion’ heresy came which claimed that gnostic gospels were the sole truth of God. Gnosticism involves various heretical doctrines like denying humanity of Jesus Christ, Literal death of Jesus on Cross etc. In order to save the church from heretical teachings, the early church leaders wanted to identify and compile the books which are truly inspired by God. Irenaeus was the first to compile as New Testament based on apostolic witness. By the end of 2^nd century, the church leaders understood and accepted the current 25 books as part of New Testament canon.

What is not Canon?

Church is not the authority of Scripture:

The most important argument of Roman Catholics for Scriptures is that, the church authorities of the past were the one who decided what books are to be part of Scripture and what books are not canon. Canon is not the list of books as approved by any human authority. Be it apostles, prophets or Church councils. The Scriptures are self-attested. God providentially illuminated the church leaders in the past to recognize and understand the superiority and the authority of the books of the New Testament. In other words, Church is not above Scripture to decide which books to include and which book to not to include. Rather, God made the church to recognise the books in the new testament as Scriptures through the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit.

Practical application of Canon:

Satan’s attack on Christianity always started with undermining the truthfulness of Scripture and to add or modify the Scripture with falsehood. Be it during the time of Adam and Eve, or with the usage of the divorce laws by Pharisees, Satan always attacks Scripture. Almost all Pseudo-Christianity like Roman Catholics, Liberals, JW, Morons have a distorted Scripture. So if you want to know if a person is truly saved or not, look at his attitude towards Scripture. They may be reading all other Christian related books, watch Christian movies, listen to contemporary Christian songs and even organise Shiloh. But If he or she is not at all interested in reading Scriptures and practically applying it in their lives, it more or less means that they are not saved. Because only a regenerated person will have a desire and passion to read the Word of God. Only a truly saved person can say: “The law of your mouth is better to me than thousands of gold and silver pieces. (Psa 119:72)”.

Also closed canon gives us assurance that we don’t need to go and run around other books and ‘prophecies’ to know about the salvation and things of above pertaining to God. We don’t need to run around special anointed leaders to know God’s will. We can read the Scriptures and God will reveal it to us His will directly to us. Read Deu 29:29.

"The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law. 

(Deu 29:29)

If Bible is truly God’s word inspired, then it also means all of what Bible says is true. The mark of a true Christian is not by just easy believerism. When I say ‘easy believer’ I mean Christians who claim to be born again but their lives have been just like that of the world. A true Christian will have new affections to please God. He would willingly want to do the things pleasing God. In order to know what pleases God, we need to go back to Scriptures since 2 Tim 3:16 says Bible is complete for all necessary Christian life. If you are a Christian, you should be asking this question to you: What motivates your daily activitities? For example, why you go to college? Why you choose a particular future goal? Why you go for shopping etc? Why do Pegasus etc…. What is your answer for these questions? If your answers are no different from what the world says, then you should be questioning your salvation. A Christian should base his life through scripture. You should be able to say the reason why you live in a way different from what the world says.

Answers for Scenarios:

1)      What about the gospel of Thomas found in 1940s? Would you add that to the gospels in current Bible? If not, Why?

Because it is not internally consistent. And God in His providence would not have kept Christians for the past 2000 years in darkness without revelation, illuminating work of the spirit

2)      Why the catholic books like Apocrypha not added in Protestant Bible?

Not internally consistent, God’s word has more authority than church councils, illuminating work of the Spirit

3)      Some Hindu sages have said Jesus Christ is mentioned in Rig Veda. So is Rig Veda also God’s Word?

Even if Jesus is mentioned, that doesn’t make any difference. Ultimately Vedas and Puranas endorse other gods also which is in total contradiction to the nature of Christian God. So either it is an intellectual plagiarism of Bible or just hearsay which ultimately means not truth.